Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
4 October 2022

Fallopia convolvulus (black bindweed)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Fallopia convolvulus (L.) Á. Löve
Preferred Common Name
black bindweed
Other Scientific Names
Bilderdykia convolvulus (L.) Dumort.
Fagopyrum convolvulus (L.) H. Gross
Fagopyrum volubile Gilib.
Fallopia convolvulus var. subalatum (Lej. & Court.) D.H.Kent
Helxine convolvulus (L.) Raf.
Polygonum convolvulus L.
Reynoutria convolvulus (L.) Shinners
Tiniaria convolvulus L. Webb. & Moq.
International Common Names
English
bear-bind
bind-corn
climbing bindweed
climbing buckwheat
wild buckwheat
Spanish
chilillo
corregüela anual
poligono trepador
French
faux liseron
renouée liseron
vrillée sauvage
Portuguese
cipo de veado de inverno
corriola-bastarda
Local Common Names
Argentina
enredadera
Brazil
cipo-de-veado-de-inverno
Chile
enredadera
Denmark
snerle-pileurt
Finland
kiertotatar
Germany
Gemeiner Winden-Knöterich
Winden-Knöterich
Iran
pichak band
Italy
convolvolo nero
erba leprina
poligono convolvolo
Japan
sobakazura
Morocco
faux liseron
Netherlands
wilde boekweit
zwaluwtong
New Zealand
cornbind
Norway
vindelskjedekne
Sweden
aakerbinda
Turkey
sarmasik coban
EPPO code
POLCO (Polygonum convolvulus)

Pictures

Fallopia convolvulus (black bindweed); habit showing flowering plant. Leaves are 2-6cm long, with small and inconspicuous flowers to 5mm in diameter.
Habit
Fallopia convolvulus (black bindweed); habit showing flowering plant. Leaves are 2-6cm long, with small and inconspicuous flowers to 5mm in diameter.
©Chris Parker/Bristol, UK
Ken Chamberlain, Ohio State University, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Ken Chamberlain, Ohio State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Doug Doohan, Ohio State University - OARDC, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Doug Doohan, Ohio State University - OARDC, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Doug Doohan, Ohio State University - OARDC, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Doug Doohan, Ohio State University - OARDC, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Lynn Sosnoskie, University of Georgia, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Phil Westra, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Phil Westra, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Phil Westra, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Phil Westra, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html
Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Fallopia convolvulus
Howard F. Schwartz, Colorado State University, bugwood.org
Refer to Bugwood: http://www.bugwood.org/ImageUsage.html

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Prevention and Control

Cultural Control

According to Holm et al. (1991), tillage implements and rotations have only limited success in controlling F. convolvulus because of its large seedbank, the ability of seeds to emerge from great depth, the persistent emergence of new seedlings throughout the growing season and the large quantities of seeds produced by the plants.

Nevertheless, there are several methods suggested which could be used to reduce possible yield losses caused by this weed. Koch (1964) observed a stimulation in emergence of F. convolvulus by harrowing, which could be taken advantage of in the control of this weed in cereal cultivation. Gruenhagen and Nalewaja (1969) and Messersmith and Nalewaja (1969) stated that higher seeding rates of the crop result in a reduction of relative yield losses through competition of F. convolvulus in wheat or flax. Moreover, Smith (1980) found out that a significant reduction of F. convolvulus could be attained by discing after barley harvest.

Different results have been published regarding the effects of tillage techniques as a means for weed control. Thompson et al. (1984) and Dessaint et al. (1993) concluded that no-tillage cultivation or reduced tillage resulted in increasing densities of F. convolvulus in comparison to conventional tillage, whereas Hoffman-Kakol et al. (1982) observed a reduction in the relative abundance of F. convolvulus in directly drilled maize after rye. Nielsen and Pinnerup (1982) also reported a decline in F. convolvulus populations caused by reduced cultivation in spring barley.

Although effective for the control of other weeds, harrowing in the dark showed no significant influence on emergence of F. convolvulus seedlings in comparison to daylight harrowing in Swedish field trials (Ascard, 1992).

According to Rajczyova (1978), monocultures of winter wheat and spring barley lead to an increase in F. convolvulus incidence.

Biological Control

Adkins and Sowerby (1996) revealed that the weed Parthenium hysterophorus has allelopathic potential against P. covolvulus. They used leachate from the leaves of P. hysterophorus to depress germination and seedling growth of F. convolvulus and several other weeds.

In a search for potential biological control agents for weeds, species of Botrytis were isolated from seedlings of F. convolvulus infected with pathogenic fungi in Canada (Mortensen and Molloy, 1993). In Argentina, the fungus Puccinia polygoni-amphibii was found to cause sufficient damage to warrant investigation as a biocontrol agent against F. convolvulus (Dal-Bello and Carranza, 1995).

Chemical Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:
PAN pesticide database (www.pesticideinfo.org)
Your national pesticide guide

Impact

F. convolvulus can reduce crop yields by competition, especially in highly infested fields (Friesen and Shebeski, 1960; Nakoneshny and Friesen, 1961; Dosland and Arnold, 1966; Fabricius and Nalewaja, 1968). Friesen and Shebeski (1960) showed that 56 and 210 plants per m² can reduce wheat yields by 15 and 25%, respectively. Crop seed weight and protein contents can also be negatively affected (Nakoneshny and Friesen, 1961; Gruenhagen and Nalewaja, 1969).

By climbing up the crop, F. convolvulus causes lodging in grain crops (Neururer, 1961; Hume et al., 1983), and can cause harvesting problems when its vines wrap around moving parts of machinery (Forsberg and Best, 1964; Fabricius and Nalewaja, 1968).

In addition, high weed densities can raise the moisture content of harvested grain (Neururer, 1961) and contribute to heating in storage when harvested with cereals as a seed contaminant (Holm et al., 1991). F. convolvulus produces large amounts of seed and they are often difficult to separate from grain crops, because of their similar size. Therefore, F. convolvulus is a serious contaminant of seed stocks in several places in the world (Gooch, 1963; Bogdan, 1965).

The general importance of this weed is due to its ability to emerge throughout the growing season. Forsberg and Best (1964) showed that late-emerging seedlings are likely to escape herbicide spraying and could be a potential source of re-infestations, especially where competition from other weeds has been eliminated.

Furthermore, F. convolvulus may serve as an alternate host for disease organisms affecting crops (Cooper and Harrison, 1973; Bendixen et al., 1979).

According to Holm et al. (1991), F. convolvulus is ranked as a principal or serious weed in 20 crops of 41 countries. It is one of the most important weeds of cereals in Argentina, Canada, Kenya, South Africa and the USA; maize in the former Soviet Union; and sugarbeet in Spain. It is a principal weed of cereals in Argentina, Australia, Canada, UK, Finland, New Zealand, Tanzania, and the USA; maize in Italy; flax in Australia, Brazil, Canada, and the USA; potatoes in Chile; sugarbeet in former Czechoslovakia, UK and Germany; beans in England; vegetables in Argentina, Bulgaria, Chile, UK and New Zealand; peas in Bulgaria and New Zealand; onions in Argentina and UK; and sorghum in Italy.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 4 October 2022

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation